Dev claim · claim-368 · #111 of 154
“The most recent IPCC report lays out a future if we limit global heating to 1.5°C instead of the Paris Agreement’s 2°C.”
Claim tags (sorted stems; highlighted when a passage shares them)
- agreement
- futur
- global
- heat
- instead
- ipcc
- lay
- limit
- pari
- recent
- report
The model’s verdict
The Transformer retrained from the notebook (the 2024 weights were never saved), shown three ways. The first is how the notebook evaluated it.
Notebook protocol
Dev claims predicted in batches of 16, in file order, from the 2024 retrieved evidence, as the notebook does.
- Supports
- 51.4%
- Refutes
- 16.5%
- Not enough info
- 18.9%
- Disputed
- 13.3%
One claim at a time
The same model run on a single claim, which is how the Try-it page runs it.
- Supports
- 47.2%
- Refutes
- 17.4%
- Not enough info
- 24.6%
- Disputed
- 10.8%
With gold evidence
Fed the human-annotated evidence instead of retrieved passages. This is the 'val accuracy' the training loop reports.
- Supports
- 53.4%
- Refutes
- 16.8%
- Not enough info
- 16.9%
- Disputed
- 12.9%
Retrieved vs gold evidence
Gold passages were picked by the dataset’s annotators. Retrieved passages are what the TF-IDF rule returned from all 1.19M passages. Switch between the submitted 2024 output and the re-runs.
2024 submission
The passages the team actually retrieved and submitted in 2024 (their saved output file). The file records only passage ids, so scores are recomputed with the submission rule.
- Path
- not recorded
- Found
- 0 of 4 gold
- P
- 0.00
- R
- 0.00
- F
- 0.00
#1evidence-779732 Justus Moak Scrafford (January 7, 1878 -- February 6, 1947) was an American track and field athlete who competed at the 1900 Summer Olympics in Paris, France.
- pari (shared with the claim)
- cos
- 0.380
- overlap
- 1.000
- score
- 1.380
- shared
- 1
#2evidence-1189988 The report was finalised in Paris.
- محمد
- pari (shared with the claim)
- report (shared with the claim)
- cos
- 0.500
- overlap
- 0.667
- score
- 1.167
- shared
- 2
#3evidence-747432 (IPCC, 2007c:819)).
- ipcc (shared with the claim)
- cos
- 0.000
- overlap
- 1.000
- score
- 1.000
- shared
- 1
#4evidence-1143842 IPCC (2007a:8) projected that in the future, over most land areas, the frequency of warm spells or heat waves would very likely increase.
- warm
- heat (shared with the claim)
- frequenc
- spell
- futur (shared with the claim)
- ipcc (shared with the claim)
- wave
- cos
- 0.555
- overlap
- 0.429
- score
- 0.984
- shared
- 3
#5evidence-234981 assessed the literature on global futures scenarios.
- assess
- literatur
- futur (shared with the claim)
- global (shared with the claim)
- scenario
- cos
- 0.545
- overlap
- 0.400
- score
- 0.945
- shared
- 2
#6evidence-908051 In 2010, Parties to the UNFCCC agreed that future global warming should be limited to below 2.0 °C (3.6 °F) relative to the pre-industrial level.
- warm
- agr
- unfccc
- futur (shared with the claim)
- limit (shared with the claim)
- global (shared with the claim)
- pre
- rel
- cos
- 0.566
- overlap
- 0.375
- score
- 0.941
- shared
- 3
Gold evidence (4)
evidence-853312 In 2015 all UN countries negotiated the Paris Agreement, which aims to keep climate change well below 2 °C.
- aim
- un
- keep
- chang
- agreement (shared with the claim)
- pari (shared with the claim)
- climat
- negoti
evidence-839100 Meeting the Paris target of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) is possible but would require "deep emissions reductions", "rapid", "far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society".
- reduct
- unprec
- rapid
- emiss
- far
- deep
- target
- aspect
evidence-46356 Deep reductions in non-CO2 emissions (such as nitrous oxide and methane) will also be required to limit warming to 1.5 °C.
- warm
- reduct
- requir
- oxid
- emiss
- deep
- methan
- nitrou
- limit (shared with the claim)
evidence-994667 Holding this rise to 1.5 °C avoids the worst effects of a rise by even 2 °C.
- even
- hold
- worst
- effect
- rise
- avoid
Optional · uses your own API key
Second opinion from an LLM
The model reads this claim and the evidence passages shown on this page, picks one of the four verdicts and cites the passages it used. It is told to judge from the passages only. You review the answer; the call and your decision go to the AI audit log in this browser.
Without a key nothing is sent anywhere. The rest of the site does not need one.