Skip to content
Climate Claim Checker

Dev claim · claim-2236 · #108 of 154

“The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2.”

Claim tags (sorted stems; highlighted when a passage shares them)

  • due
  • increas
  • major
  • peer
  • predict
  • research
  • review
  • time
  • warm

Annotators’ label

Supports Run this claim live

The model’s verdict

The Transformer retrained from the notebook (the 2024 weights were never saved), shown three ways. The first is how the notebook evaluated it.

Notebook protocol

Dev claims predicted in batches of 16, in file order, from the 2024 retrieved evidence, as the notebook does.

Not enough info✗ differs from the label
Supports
28.3%
Refutes
7.8%
Not enough info
54.1%
Disputed
9.9%

One claim at a time

The same model run on a single claim, which is how the Try-it page runs it.

Supports✓ matches the label
Supports
40.0%
Refutes
13.6%
Not enough info
35.6%
Disputed
10.7%

With gold evidence

Fed the human-annotated evidence instead of retrieved passages. This is the 'val accuracy' the training loop reports.

Supports✓ matches the label
Supports
62.5%
Refutes
27.2%
Not enough info
1.2%
Disputed
9.0%

Retrieved vs gold evidence

Gold passages were picked by the dataset’s annotators. Retrieved passages are what the TF-IDF rule returned from all 1.19M passages. Switch between the submitted 2024 output and the re-runs.

2024 submission

The passages the team actually retrieved and submitted in 2024 (their saved output file). The file records only passage ids, so scores are recomputed with the submission rule.

Path
not recorded
Found
0 of 1 gold
P
0.00
R
0.00
F
0.00
  1. #1evidence-748778

    Reviews in American History is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal established in 1973 and published by the Johns Hopkins University Press.

    • review (shared with the claim)
    cos
    0.446
    overlap
    1.000
    score
    1.446
    shared
    1
  2. #2evidence-938221

    He was then due for review in April 2018.

    • due (shared with the claim)
    • review (shared with the claim)
    • april
    cos
    0.520
    overlap
    0.667
    score
    1.186
    shared
    2
  3. #3evidence-10408

    Review of Research in Education is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by Sage Publications on behalf of the American Educational Research Association.

    • research (shared with the claim)
    • review (shared with the claim)
    • educ
    cos
    0.506
    overlap
    0.667
    score
    1.172
    shared
    2
  4. #4evidence-358132

    State and Local Government Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic journal on public administration.

    • review (shared with the claim)
    • peer (shared with the claim)
    • quarterli
    cos
    0.446
    overlap
    0.667
    score
    1.113
    shared
    2
  5. #5evidence-873135

    Energy and Environmental Science is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing original (primary) research and review articles.

    • review (shared with the claim)
    • peer (shared with the claim)
    • monthli
    cos
    0.446
    overlap
    0.667
    score
    1.113
    shared
    2
  6. #6evidence-188059

    The researchers predicted:

    • research (shared with the claim)
    • محمد
    • predict (shared with the claim)
    cos
    0.371
    overlap
    0.667
    score
    1.038
    shared
    2

Gold evidence (1)

  1. evidence-976285

    A survey of peer-reviewed scientific papers published between 1965 and 1979 shows that the large majority of research at the time predicted that the earth would warm as carbon-dioxide levels rose — as indeed it has."

    • rose
    • survey
    • peer (shared with the claim)
    • dioxid
    • predict (shared with the claim)
    • ind

Optional · uses your own API key

Second opinion from an LLM

The model reads this claim and the evidence passages shown on this page, picks one of the four verdicts and cites the passages it used. It is told to judge from the passages only. You review the answer; the call and your decision go to the AI audit log in this browser.

Evidence to send

Without a key nothing is sent anywhere. The rest of the site does not need one.